-Arizona Criminal Attorney Dwane Cates
Racketeering & Rico Attorney in Phoenix
Defense for Arizona Enterprise Charges & Federal RICO Allegations
Racketeering cases can combine multiple alleged offenses, financial records, witness testimony, electronic communications, and claims that criminal activity was connected to an enterprise. represents clients facing Arizona racketeering investigations, charges involving illegal control or conduct of an enterprise, and federal RICO allegations.
Our criminal defense work includes white collar matters involving fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, identity theft, bribery, and public corruption. We also represent clients facing drug, theft, forfeiture, and serious federal criminal matters.
That breadth of criminal defense experience can be important when prosecutors rely on separate alleged offenses to support a broader enterprise or racketeering theory.
Call (480) 864-3807 or contact us online to discuss a racketeering investigation or charge directly with our lawyers.
Credentials for Complex Enterprise Cases
We have nearly three decades of experience representing clients in criminal matters, including serious state and federal cases involving substantial discovery, multiple witnesses, and overlapping allegations.
Founding attorney Dwane Cates is a State Bar of Arizona Board-Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Arizona’s criminal-law certification process includes substantial criminal-law experience, peer review, a specialization examination, and specific trial and hearing experience requirements.
These credentials are relevant in cases where prosecutors rely on complicated financial activity, communications, business relationships, or multiple alleged offenses to build an enterprise case.
Lawyer-Led Racketeering Case Preparation
Clients work directly with our lawyers throughout their cases. We examine the conduct prosecutors attribute to each person, the structure of the alleged enterprise, and the evidence claimed to connect separate transactions or events.
Our preparation can include reviewing financial and business records, electronic communications, witness testimony, search warrants, seized property, and the underlying offenses prosecutors identify as racketeering activity.
We also examine how evidence was obtained, whether searches and seizures complied with constitutional requirements, and whether the available proof establishes each element of the charged offense.
Arizona Enterprise Charges vs. Federal RICO
Arizona and federal law use related concepts, but they are separate legal frameworks with different statutory requirements.
Arizona Illegal Control of an Enterprise
Under A.R.S. § 13-2312(A), a person commits illegal control of an enterprise when, through racketeering or its proceeds, the person acquires or maintains control of an enterprise.
Arizona Illegally Conducting an Enterprise
A.R.S. § 13-2312(B) applies when a person employed by or associated with an enterprise conducts its affairs through racketeering, or directly or indirectly participates in the conduct of an enterprise that the person knows is being conducted through racketeering.
Arizona defines an enterprise broadly to include corporations, partnerships, associations, labor unions, other legal entities, and groups of people associated in fact even when they do not form a legal entity.
The state’s definition of racketeering includes numerous qualifying offenses and, for many listed offenses, requires conduct committed for financial gain.
Federal RICO Allegations
Federal RICO is governed primarily by 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 through 1963.
One commonly charged provision, § 1962(c), prohibits a person employed by or associated with an enterprise that affects interstate or foreign commerce from conducting or participating in the enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.
Federal law defines a pattern of racketeering activity as requiring at least two qualifying racketeering acts within the statutory time period. Courts also require the alleged acts to satisfy additional principles concerning their relationship and continuity.
These differences matter. A criminal charge under Arizona’s enterprise statute should not be analyzed simply by applying federal RICO requirements, and federal RICO allegations should not be evaluated solely under Arizona racketeering law.
Testimonials
-
“I hired Hayley to represent My Son on some pretty serious charges . Hayley’s knowledge and commitment to seeing this case through has been more than exceptional she has kept me informed throughout this whole process and has been more than clear on al”- Former Client
-
“Aaron is an excellent lawyer. Every bit of information he said was always clear and concise he explained everything to where it made sense, and never left me guessing about what’s going on.”- Former Client
-
“Working with Aaron Reed was the best decision I could have made. From day one, he listened to me, explained everything clearly, and guided me through each step of the process.”- Former Client
-
“From Showing up to Court Dates when I was absent, to going the extra mile to help me across state lines from Alabama to Arizona to handle my case like I had family in Phoenix helping me.”- Former Client
Cates & Reed's YouTube Channel
-
35+ Years of Experience -
Board-Certified Specialist in Arizona Criminal Law -
24/7 Availability